M-Pesa
Vodacom Tanzania
Same brand as Kenya, different company and different system — a Kenyan M-Pesa integration does not carry across. Strong share, particularly in Dar.
Built remotely from Nairobi, on the same stack and the same published prices as every Kenyan project. No Dar es Salaam office — we would rather say that than imply one.
Tanzania is the one East African market where the mobile-money field is genuinely competitive rather than a single dominant player with a challenger. Vodacom M-Pesa, Mixx by Yas (formerly Tigo Pesa) and Airtel Money all hold real share, and interoperability between them is better than most of the region — Tanzanian mobile money clears fast, with a median transfer under a minute. For a merchant that means one practical thing: you cannot pick one wallet and ignore the rest the way a Kenyan shop can lean entirely on M-Pesa.
WhatsApp checkout works identically everywhere — the cart builds a structured order message and sends it to your number. It does not care which country you are in or which network you use, which is exactly why it is the default we ship on every shop.
Vodacom Tanzania
Same brand as Kenya, different company and different system — a Kenyan M-Pesa integration does not carry across. Strong share, particularly in Dar.
Yas Tanzania (formerly Tigo Pesa)
Rebranded from Tigo Pesa and still widely called that. Substantial share; ignoring it loses real customers.
Airtel Tanzania
The third of three that actually matter here, with strength outside the major cities.
Most of the build is identical. These are the parts that genuinely are not, listed here rather than discovered halfway through a project.
Three wallets matter, not one — a single-wallet checkout leaves money on the table in a way it would not in Kenya
Tanzanian M-Pesa is Vodacom's, operationally separate from Safaricom's — our Kenyan M-Pesa integration does not transfer
Automated mobile-money checkout is quoted per project rather than at the fixed KES 20,000 Kenyan add-on price
Swahili is far more dominant in commerce here than in Kenya; if your customers expect a Swahili-first site, say so at brief and we scope it in
Prices are the published KES ones — Starter KES 30,000, Standard KES 55,000, Premium KES 95,000+. We do not run a cross-border markup. You pay in KES or the equivalent at the day's rate, 50% deposit and balance on delivery, same as any Nairobi client.
Full pricing breakdown →Fully remote, and we say that plainly rather than implying a local office. Briefs and daily updates run on WhatsApp, design review over video. Timelines are the same as Kenya: 5-7 days for Starter, 2 weeks Standard, 3-4 weeks Premium.
Dar es Salaam is about 1 hour 20 minutes to Dar es Salaam from Nairobi if a project genuinely warrants meeting in person — not something we build into a quote by default.
Yes, remotely from Nairobi — same stack, same timelines, same published KES pricing with no cross-border markup. We have no Dar es Salaam office and do not claim one. What differs from a Kenyan project is the payment side: three mobile-money wallets carry real share here rather than one dominant rail.
Same brand, different operator. Kenyan M-Pesa is Safaricom's; Tanzanian M-Pesa is Vodacom Tanzania's, and they are operationally separate systems with separate merchant registration and separate APIs. A Kenyan M-Pesa integration does not carry across the border, which is exactly why we quote Tanzanian automated checkout per project rather than applying our Kenyan add-on price to it.
Realistically all three — Vodacom M-Pesa, Mixx by Yas (which plenty of customers still call Tigo Pesa) and Airtel Money. Tanzania does not have Kenya's single-rail dominance, so supporting one wallet quietly turns away customers on the other two. With WhatsApp checkout this costs you nothing: you send whichever number matches what the customer uses.
Yes, and in Tanzania it is worth asking the question seriously rather than defaulting to English the way a Nairobi brand might. Raise it at brief so we scope the copy properly; retrofitting a second language after launch costs more than building for it from the start.